Single-paragraph order disposing of Writ Petition No. 22103 of 2019. Petitioner alleged respondent no. 4 made payments including gratuity interest. Court disposed of the matter due to lack of dispute.
The writ petition was disposed of based on the absence of any dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BP Sl. 9
WPA 22103 of 2019 (Via Video Conference)
Ashok Banerjee Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Bikash Shaw ..for the petitioner.
Mr. Tarak Dutta Mr. Ravi Kumar Dubey Mr. S. Dutta ..for the respondent no.4.
Mr. Susanta Pal Mr. Ananda Dulal Sarkar ..for the State.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the payments have been made by the respondent no.4 which includes the compound interest on gratuity.
Therefore, the matter may be disposed of as there is no dispute as has been raised in this writ application.
The matter is disposed of.
(Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J. )
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ application requires disposal on the ground of undisputed facts.
Whether the respondent has made payments including compound interest on gratuity.
Ashok Banerjee
The State of West Bengal
The Respondent No.4
Abhijit Gangopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
