Dinesh Kumar Goyal(Huf) and Another v. Deputy Commissioner Bbd Bag Division 2 and Another
Calcutta HCWPA/2636/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Court No.26 SD WPA 2636 of 2021 (Via Video…
What the court decided
AI extract
Court No.26 SD WPA 2636 of 2021 (Via Video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S/L 246 17.03.2021 Court No.26 SD
WPA 2636 of 2021 (Via Video Conference)
Dinesh Kumar Goyal (HUF) & Anr. Vs.
Deputy Commissioner, B.B.D. Bag & Ors.
Mr. R.N. Dutt Ms. Sutapa Roychoudhury
… for the Petitioners.
Mr. Uday Shankar Bhattacharya Mr. Tapan Bhanja
… for the Respondent No.1.
This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in considering their prayer for rectification dated September 22, 2020.
I have heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perused the materials placed on record.
Accordingly, I direct the Deputy Commissioner, B.B.D. Bag, Division II, Kolkata – North, Range-V being the respondent no.1 herein to grant an opportunity of hearing to the parties and thereafter pass a reasoned order with regard to the said representation within a period of eight weeks from date. The reasoned order shall be communicated to the petitioners within a week from the date of passing of the same.
I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of this case.
2
With these above observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether Union of India is liable to the extent of maintaining staff of employees at the time when the petitioner had not demanded such staff
Whether condemnation of the proposed school building by State Ministry of Home Department is legally sound
Whether Union of India is liable in case of breach of contract of employment
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dinesh Kumar Goyal (HUF) & Anr.
Deputy Commissioner, B.B.D. Bag & Ors.
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court