No assets of the award debtor existing within the court's jurisdiction, the execution petition (EC 155 of 2019) and its connected application (IA No. GA 1 of 2020) were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-2
ORDER SHEET
EC/155/2019
IA NO. GA/1/2020 (OLD NO. GA/488/2020) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL DIVISION ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
RAJENDRA KUMAR PODDAR VERSUS
SHIRLEY BENNO SEBASTIAN
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date: 17th March, 2021.
(Via Video Conference)
Appearance: Ms. Nilanjana Adhya, Adv. Mr. Anket Chaudhury, Adv.
Mr. Anirban Ray, Adv.
The Court: The execution petition and the connected application therein are taken up for consideration.
There being no asset of the award debtor within the jurisdiction of this Court, EC 155 of 2019 is disposed of.
IA No. GA 1 of 2020 in EC 155 of 2019 is also disposed of.
(DEBANGSU BASAK, J.)
sp/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the execution petition can be disposed of in absence of assets within jurisdiction.
RAJENDRA KUMAR PODDAR
SHIRLEY BENNO SEBASTIAN
DEBANGSU BASAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
