A writ application under Article 226 was dismissed as no further order was required after the petitioner's wife, who was missing, was recovered during the pendency of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
N.22Sl
W.P.A.(H) No.16 of 2021
151/CL In re: An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India:
And
13.07.2021 Sl-16 In re: Deblu Dutta Ct.30 v. (S.R.) The State of West Bengal & Ors. via video conference
Mr. Balaram Pandit … for the petitioner.
Mr. Rana Mukherjee, APP Md. Sabir Ahmed … for the State.
Mr. Pandit, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s wife, who was missing, has already been recovered during pendency of this petition.
Mr. Ahmed, learned advocate appears on behalf of the State.
Upon hearing the learned advocates and since the wife of the petitioner, who was missing, had already been recovered, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Deblu Dutta
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Suvra Ghosh
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
