Begum Ayesha Julka Khan v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as 'not pressed' upon the petitioner's instruction to withdraw the matter. No costs were awarded.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as 'not pressed' upon the petitioner's instruction to withdraw the matter. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dl. August 10, 26. 2021
Through Video Conference
W.P.S.T. 32 of 2021
Mr. Md. Hafiz Ali, …for the petitioner.
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits, on instruction, that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the matter any further and that he has been instructed to withdraw the matter.
The written instruction dated July 4, 2021 filed in court today is taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as “not pressed”.
There will be no order as to costs.
( Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J. )
dns
Petitioner
Respondent
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court