The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner retired during the pendency of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01 09.8.2021
WPCT 137 of 2010
Ct-16
ar
Smt. Usha Majumdar Vs. Union of India & ors.
Mr. Gobindo Chaudhury
…. For the Petitioner
Mr. Pramod Kumar Drolia
…. For Union of India
In view of the fact that the petitioner has retired during the pendency of the writ application, this writ petition accordingly has now become infructuous.
WPCT 137 of 2010 is thus dismissed as infructuous.
Urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya,J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
2
Smt. Usha Majumdar
Union of India
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
