23.12.2021 MAT 952 of 2021 With CAN 1 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9 ss/jks 23.12.2021
MAT 952 of 2021 With CAN 1 of 2021
S.P. Enterprise, represented by Sudipta Putatunda Vs. Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Limited & Ors. (Through Video Conference)
Ms. Suchishmita Chatterjee
… … for the respondents
None present for the appellant.
Submission of learned counsel for the respondents is that with the laps of time nothing survives in this appeal as the appellant had approached the Writ Court with the plea that he could not participate in the tender process as he had received the tender papers late.
He has pointed out that the work was awarded to the respondent no. 6 and one more vendor on 7th October, 2020 and the initial period of contract was one year which is also over.
Be that as it may, since on one is present to prosecute the appeal, therefore the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Prakash Shrivastava, C.J.)
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)
S.P. Enterprise
Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Limited & Ors.
Prakash Shrivastava
Rajarshi Bharadwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
