Securitization Act were initiated by the respondent/company and that questioning the order of the District Magistrate dated 16th of September, 2020, the appellant had approached the DRT, Kolkata under Section 17 of the Securitization Act and the said application was rejected by order dated 29th of November, 2021 passed in SA 103 of 2021 on the ground of limitation whereas the appellant was protected by the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court whereby the limitation was extended during the COVID period. Hence, the appellant had filed M.A. No.11 of 2021 before the DRT for review/recall of the order. He submits that all these proceedings were suppressed by the respondent/borrower and the borrower has persuaded the learned Single Judge to pass the order impugned. He has also submitted that the DRT order dated 21st of December, 2021 has rejected the M.A. filed by the appellant without properly appreciating the ground raised therein and since DRAT is not functioning, therefore, in terms of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 16th of December, 2021 passed in S.L.P. (C) No.10911 of 2021, the appellant will now be approaching the writ court challenging the said order but in the meanwhile the appellant be protected because in terms of the order of the learned Single Judge possession will be taken on 24th of December, 2021.
