Dismissed
Tapan Mondal v. State
Calcutta HCCRR/83/2001
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
C.R.R. 83 of 2001 (Via Video Conference) In…
What the court decided
AI extract
C.R.R. 83 of 2001 (Via Video Conference) In…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
316 akb
13.8 2021
C.R.R. 83 of 2001 (Via Video Conference)
Ct. No. 26
In the matter of : Tapan Mondal
….Petitioner
Mr. Tarun Kumar Chatterjee …for the State.
This revisional application has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to act expeditiously in accordance with law.
( Shekhar B. Saraf, J. )
Tapan Mondal
The State
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court