Tapan Kumar Ghosh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The revisional application was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioner. Connected applications were dismissed, and interim orders were vacated.
What did the court decide?
Revisional application dismissed for default; connected applications dismissed; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
328 akb
13.8 2021
C.R.R. 2126 of 2004 (Via Video Conference)
Ct. No. 26
In the matter of : Tapan Kumar Ghosh
….Petitioner
Ms. Rita Dutta …for the State.
This revisional application has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tapan Kumar Ghosh
- respondent
Ms. Rita Dutta
Coram
Shekhar B. Saraf
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/2126/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court