Disposed

Tarikul Shak @ Tarikul Shekh v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC18 Mar 2021CRR/623/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this revisional application, the High Court, noting that the petitioner has been in custody since July 2019 despite the charge sheet being submitted in August 2019, directed the trial court to expedite the framing of charges on the next available date.

What did the court decide?

High Court requested trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously and frame charges on the next date of hearing or within a fortnight.

Tarikul Shak @ Tarikul Shekh Vs State of West Bengal — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

164 18.03.2021 rkd Ct. no.32

¶2

C.R.R. 623 of 2021

¶3

In the matter of: Tarikul Shak @ Tarikul Shekh ….petitioner. Mr. D. Kundu …for the petitioner. Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, P.P., Mr. A. Hossain, Ms. B. Hasna

¶4

…for the petitioner. …for the State.

¶5

This is an application seeking an expeditious disposal of a proceeding in which a charge sheet was submitted under Sections 21(c) of the NDPS Act.

¶6

Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner is taken on record.

¶7

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner is an accused in this case. He is in custody since his date of arrest i.e. 21.07.2019. Although the case was started in July, 2019 and the charge sheet was submitted in August, 2019, till date even charges could not be framed. The next date is fixed as 16.04.2021 for production and framing of charge. The proceeding has largely remained pending for no fault of the present petitioner.

¶8

Learned counsel for the State submits that the impugned proceeding may be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶9

I have heard the submissions of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the State and have perused the revision petition.

¶10

It appears that the some delay was occasioned in concluding the impugned proceeding, especially considering the

¶11

¶12

fact that the petitioner is in custody since 21.07.2019.

¶13

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, I request the learned trial court to conclude the proceeding as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and in particular, to decide the question of framing of charge on the next date fixed for hearing, preferably on the next date of hearing or within a fortnight from such date.

¶14

With these observations, the revisional application is disposed of.

¶15

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

¶16

(Jay Sengupta, J.)

Tarikul Shak @ Tarikul Shekh v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarikul Shak @ Tarikul Shekh v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Azijul Mondal Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Indranuj Chowdhury Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Purna Chandra Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Habibur Molla @ Habibur Rahaman Molla Vs State of West Bengal

Harimohan Mondal @ Harimohan Mandal @ Mohan Vs State of West Bengal

Rakesh Adhikary @ Rakesh Adhikari Vs State of West Bengal