The petitioner abandoned the application and elected to raise the points before the trial court while considering charges. The application was disposed of as not pressed.
Application disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
201 17.03.2021 rkd Ct. no.32
C.R.R. 557 of 2021
In the matter of: Indranuj Chowdhury ….petitioner. Mr. M. Mukherjkee, Mr. A. Singh, Mr. S. Halder, Mr. S. Mondal …for the petitioner.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would not like to press this application and would instead raise all the points taken up in this application before the learned trial court at the time of consideration of charge.
Accordingly, the application is disposed of as not pressed. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Indranuj Chowdhury
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
