In a revisional application (CRR No.571 of 2011), the High Court dismissed the petition for default due to the petitioner's consistent non-appearance. The court held they had lost interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.09.2021 Item no.4 Ct. No.39 CHC
C.R.R. No.571 of 2011 (Physical Hearing)
In the matter of:-
Bhuban Mohan Sau …..petitioner
None appears for the petitioner even in virtual mode.
No accommodation is proposed for on behalf of the petitioner. Yesterday nobody appeared for the petitioner, when the matter was called on for hearing. Similarly, several dates, previously fixed for the purpose, went adjourned, for the non appearance of the petitioner.
Petitioner appears to have lost his interest over this case.
This revisional application is relatable to 2011. No use of getting the matter listed any more.
The revisional application being CRR No.571 of 2011 stands dismissed for default.
Department is directed to make communication of this order the learned court below for information within a week from hence.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
Bhuban Mohan Sau
Subhasis Dasgupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
