This single-line order dismisses a revisional application under Section 144 CrPC as infructuous due to the lapse of time.
Revisional application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 39 Sl 73 Ssi 17.09. 2021
C.R.R. 410 of 2011
In the Matter of: Sajdel Haque Gazi
Mr. Ibrahim Shaikh ….for the petitioner
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the revisional application pertains to an order passed under Section 144 of the Code in the year 2010. As such, the revisional application has become infructuous due to the passage of time.
In view of the above, the revisional application is dismissed as infructuous.
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sajdel Haque Gazi
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
