Prof. Dr. Falguni Chakraborty v. Badal Mondal & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Ct. No. 39 CRR 314 of 2011 In the matter of…
Ct. No. 39 CRR 314 of 2011 In the matter of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04 16.09.2021 NB
CRR 314 of 2011
Ct. No. 39
In the matter of:- Prof. Dr. Falguni Chakraborty …petitioner
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, when the matter is called on for hearing. No accommodation is sought.
On the last few occasions i.e. on 08.09.2011, 13.09.2021, 14.09.2021 and 15.09.2021 when the matter was called on for hearing, nobody represented the petitioner or prayed for any adjournment.
Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Prof. Dr. Falguni Chakraborty
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court