Petitioner filed a revisional application challenging a conviction. The court held the application infructuous as the trial was completed and conviction pronounced. The application was disposed of with directions to the lower court.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; lower court directed to act expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27.09.2021 62 ss (via Video Conference) CRR 3863 of 2008
Nishant Jain
Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Mr. Ayan Bhattacharya
… for the petitioner
Mr. Phiroze Edulji Mr. Samrat Goswami
… for the C.B.I.
This revisional application is detagged from the array of the other revisional applications.
Mr. Ayan Bhattacharya, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in this matter the trial has been completed and the petitioner has been convicted. He, accordingly, submits that this matter has now become infructuous.
In view of the submission made above, this revisional application is disposed of as infructuous. The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below.
The lower Court is directed to expeditiously act in accordance with law.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Nishant Jain
Central Bureau of Investigation
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
