Mahasin Mondal v. Jarina Begum
Case brief
What is this about?
Revisional application dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner. Lower Court directed to act expeditiously.
What did the court decide?
Revisional application dismissed for default; communication of order to lower Court and report of compliance required.
What the court decided
12 akb
01.07 2021
C.R.R. 373 of 2005 (Via Video Conference)
Ct. No. 26
In the matter of : Mahasin Mondal
….Petitioner
This revisional application has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to act expeditiously in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mahasin Mondal
Coram
Shekhar B. Saraf
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/373/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court