Satya Pal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance. The department was directed to communicate the order and report compliance, while the lower court was directed to act expeditiously.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed; department directed to communicate order and report compliance within three weeks.
What the court decided
01.07.2021 ss (via Video Conference) 33 CRR 3278 of 2005 In re: An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In the matter of: Satya Pal … Petitioner Mr. Rana Mukherjee Ms. Sujata Das Ms. Debjani Sahu … for the State.
This matter has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to expeditiously act in accordance with law.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satya Pal
- respondent
State
Coram
Shekhar B. Saraf
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/3278/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court