The revisional application was disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner due to incurable defects, with instructions to provide a certified copy upon application.
Application disposed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
99 11.02.2021 rkd Ct. no.32
C.R.R. 344 of 2021
In the matter of: Fantush Shaw @ Shyam Kumar Shaw ….petitioner.
Mr. S. Bhattacharya
…for the petitioner.
Learned advocate on record appearing for the petitioner submits that there are incurable defects in the revision petition and therefore the petitioner would not like to press the same and would like to file a fresh application on the selfsame grounds.
Accordingly, the revisional application is disposed of as not pressed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Fantush Shaw @ Shyam Kumar Shaw
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
