This order dismisses the petitioner's revisional application after holding that interim bail cancellation required immediate surrender. No substantive legal issue was addressed.
Dismissed the revisional application without passing a formal order since surrender was mandatory after bail cancellation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
71 10.02.2021 rkd Ct. no.32
C.R.R. 331 of 2021
In the matter of: Tarapada Bera ….petitioner.
Mr. P. Bhattacharjee, Mr. A. K. Das
…for the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the interim bail granted to the petitioner was cancelled by the learned Sessions Court and a warrant of arrest was issued. He wants to surrender before the learned trial court.
Since the interim bail was cancelled, it was incumbent upon the petitioner to surrender before the learned trial court forthwith.
Hence, no order need be passed in this case.
Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Tarapada Bera
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
