Dismissed
Ajit Shah v. State
Calcutta HCCRR/30/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
C.R.R. 30 of 2006 With C.R.R. 251 of 2006…
What the court decided
AI extract
C.R.R. 30 of 2006 With C.R.R. 251 of 2006…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
125 21.9 & 2021 126 Ct. No. 26 akb
C.R.R. 30 of 2006 With C.R.R. 251 of 2006 (Via Video Conference)
In the matter of : Ajit Shah
….Petitioner
Mr. Partha Pratim Das
…for the State
These revisional applications have been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners in both the revisional applications. No accommodation has been prayed for. When these matters were called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Accordingly, the revisional applications are dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to act expeditiously in accordance with law.
( Shekhar B. Saraf, J. )
Ajit Shah
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court