Satyajit Bhowal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Revisional application dismissed for default in the absence of the petitioner; lower Court directed to act expeditiously and department to acknowledge order.
What did the court decide?
Revisional application dismissed for default; lower Court and department directed to ensure compliance.
What the court decided
124 akb
21.9 2021
C.R.R. 29 of 2006 (Via Video Conference)
Ct. No. 26
In the matter of : Satyajit Bhowal
….Petitioner
Mr. Abhra Mukherjee …for the State
This revisional application has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satyajit Bhowal
- respondent
the State
Coram
Shekhar B. Saraf
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/29/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court