Order dismissing revisional application for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner on three consecutive hearing dates without seeking accommodation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.11.2021 35 SB Ct. No.39
CRR 2498 of 2012
In the matter of : Smt. Priti Das
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called on for hearing. No accommodation is sought.
On the last few occasions, i.e. on 15.09.2021, 16.09.2021 and 04.10.2021 when the matter was called on for hearing no one appeared on behalf of petitioner or prayed for any accommodation.
Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Smt. Priti Das
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
