Sumanta Ghosh v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for anticipatory bail under section 438 CrPC was dismissed because the petition instructed the legal representative not to press the application.
Application for anticipatory bail under section 438 CrPC was dismissed because the petition instructed the legal representative not to press the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18. 01.10.2021 Ct.32 Tanmoy
C.R.M. 5137 of 2021
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
And
In the matter of: - Sumanta Ghosh …petitioner. Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Ld. Sr. Adv., Mr. Somopriyo Chowdhury, Ms. Ruchika Mall, Ms. Ankita Dey …for the petitioner. Mrs. Zareen N. Khan, Mr. M.F. Ahmed Begg …for the State. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press this application for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 5137 of 2021 is dismissed as not pressed .
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)
Sumanta Ghosh
The State
Bivas Pattanayak
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court