Partly allowed

Mannan Ali @ Abdul Mannan and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC1 Oct 2021CRM/4108/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposes of an anticipatory bail application regarding an assault case. Denies bail to the main assailant (petitioner no. 1) due to prima facie complicity but grants it to other petitioners with a bond, allowing immediate custodial interrogation only for the accused who caused physical injury.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail dismissed for petitioner no. 1; granted to other petitioners upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties.

Mannan Ali @ Abdul Mannan and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

15 01-10-2021 (ct. no.32) KOLE Allowed

¶2

CRM 4108 of 2021

¶3

In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanchal Police Station Case No. 162 of 2021 dated 03.03.2021 under Sections 447/326/307/376/511/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

A n d -

¶5

In the matter of : Mannan Ali @ Abdul Mannan & Ors.

¶6

.... Petitioners.

¶7

Mr. K. Bagchi, Mr. D. Ghosh, Mr. A. Sarkar,

¶8

… For the Petitioners.

¶9

Mr. P. K. Dutta, Ld. APP Mr. S. Deb Roy,

¶10

The petitioners say that the present complaint is a counter blast. The petitioners have filed a complaint against the present complainant and his family. The dispute is civil in nature concerning land.

¶11

We have seen the statement of the injured victim. It prima facie appears that the petitioner no. 1 is the main assailant who caused fracture of one of the legs of the complainant.

¶12

On an overall assessment of the material on record and the prima facie complicity of the petitioner no. 1 in the alleged offence, although charge sheet has been submitted, we are not inclined to allow his prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶13

The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed in so far as the petitioner no. 1 is concerned.

¶14

¶15

In so far as the other petitioners are concerned, we do not find prima facie incriminating material against them. In our view, their immediate custodial interrogation is not necessary.

¶16

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, Sanaulla @ Mohd Sanaullah, Samim Ali @ Sk Samim and Sabera Bibi shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and shall abide by the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure until further orders.

¶17

In the event the petitioners fail to adhere to any of the conditions stipulated in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the anticipatory bail without further reference to this Court.

¶18

The application for anticipatory bail being CRM 4108 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

¶19

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶20

( Bivas Pattanayak, J. ) ( Arijit Banerjee, J. )

Mannan Ali @ Abdul Mannan and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mannan Ali @ Abdul Mannan and Ors. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Shit Vs State of West Bengal

Aloke Samaddar Vs State of West Bengal

Kadhir Ibrahim@Kadir Ibrahim Vs Union of India

Poonam Das Vs State of West Bengal

Sumanta Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal

Sk. Faruk and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal