An application for bail under Section 439 CrPC was dismissed because it was not pressed by the applicant's counsel. A written instruction was recorded.
The application for bail was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14.07.2021
Court No. 30 Item No. 12 Suvayan/sb
(DNP)
(Via Video Conference)
CRM 3017 of 2020 With IA No. CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No. CRAN 1429 of 2020) With CRAN 2 of 2020
(CRAN 2 of 2020 not here)
In Re: An application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Panskura Police Station Case No. 495 of 2019 dated 08.10.2019 under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.
And
In the matter of: Nabarun Mishra
…… Petitioner
Mr. Musharraf Hossain, Advocate Mr. Satadru Lahiri, Advocate
……for the Petitioner
Mr. Sudipto Moitra, Sr. Advocate Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya, Advocate
……for the de facto complainant
Mr. S. G. Mukherje, Ld. P.P. Mr. N. Ahamed, Advocate Mr. Anwar Hossain, Advocate Ms. Amita Gaur, Advocate
…… for the State
On the prayer of Mr. Lahiri, learned advocate for the petitioner, the application being CRM 3017 of 2020 and IA No. CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No. CRAN 1429 of 2020) and CRAN 2 of 2020 are dismissed as not pressed.
Let the written instruction as produced, be kept on record.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
2
Nabarun Mishra
Mr. Sudipto Moitra, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya
The State
Suvra Ghosh
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
