Saddam Hossain v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was dismissed because the petitioner's advocate instructed not to press the application, resulting in nonprosecution.
An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was dismissed because the petitioner's advocate instructed not to press the application, resulting in nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
76 18-08-2021 (ct. no.32) ssi
| (Via Video Conference) CRM 2889 of 2021 |
|---|
| **In re:**An application for Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. - A n d - |
| In the matter of : Saddam Hossain. .... Petitioner. |
| Mr. Musharraf Alam Sk. … For the Petitioner. |
| Mr. Binoy Panda |
| Mr. Nirupam Dhali Ms. Sima Biswas |
| … For the State. |
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he has instruction not to press this application for anticipatory bail. CRM 2889 of 2021 is accordingly dismissed for nonprosecution.
( Suvra Ghosh, J. ) ( Arijit Banerjee, J. )
Saddam Hossain
The State
Suvra Ghosh
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court