Allowed

Khokan Panja @ Khokon Panja v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC17 Sept 2021CRM/2337/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. Directed that petitioner be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 if arrested, noting injuries were insignificant and a free fight involved counter-complaints.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one local, and abiding by Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Khokan Panja @ Khokon Panja Vs State of West Bengal — Cheating and Forgery | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

32 17-09-2021 (ct. no.32) KOLE Allowed

¶2

CRM 2337 of 2021

¶3

In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kolaghat Police Station Case No. 412 of 2020 dated 10.12.2020 under Sections 447/323/325/307/354/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

A n d -

¶5

In the matter of : Khokan Panja @ Khokon Panja

¶6

.... Petitioner.

¶7

Mr. S. De,

¶8

Mr. P. K. Datta, Ld. APP, Mr. S. Deb. Roy,

¶9

The petitioner says that the present complaint is a counter blast to the complaint lodged by the petitioner’s mother against the present defacto complainant. The complaint lodged by the petitioner’s mother is numbered 411 of 2020, whereas the present complaint is numbered 412 of 2020 in the same Police Station, i.e., Kolaghat.

¶10

We have seen the material in the case diary including the injury report. The injury is insignificant.

¶11

From the material in the case diary it appears that there was a free fight between two groups of the same family. Case and counter-case have been filed. There is no significant injury suffered by anyone.

¶12

On an overall assessment of the material on record and considering the fact that the charge sheet has already been filed, we are of the view that immediate custodial interrogation of the

¶13

¶14

petitioner may not be necessary so long as he cooperates with the Investigating Officer.

¶15

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, Khokan Panja @ Khokon Panja shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and shall abide by the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure until further orders.

¶16

In the event the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions stipulated in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the anticipatory bail without further reference to this Court.

¶17

The application for anticipatory bail being CRM 2337 of 2021 is, thus, allowed.

¶18

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶19

( Bivas Pattanayak, J. ) ( Arijit Banerjee, J. )

Khokan Panja @ Khokon Panja v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khokan Panja @ Khokon Panja v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jahiruddin @Babua Vs State of West Bengal

Saddam Sk @ Pichhi Vs State of West Bengal

Biswajit Gorai Vs State of West Bengal

Sk Abdullah and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Haridas Durlav and Another Vs State of West Bengal

MD Helaluddin Chaudhuri @ Rintu Daktar Vs State of West Bengal