Disposed

Jahiruddin @Babua v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC16 Sept 2021CRM/1869/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-bench criminal revision deciding a bail application where the age of the petitioner at the time of the offence is disputed. The court directed the Juvenile Justice Board to determine his age within eight weeks and granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum once the decision is settled.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach the appropriate forum once the age of the petitioner is settled by the Juvenile Justice Board.

Jahiruddin @Babua Vs State of West Bengal — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

29. 16.09.2021 Ct.32 Tanmoy

¶2

C.R.M. 1869 of 2021

¶3

In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 15/02/2021 arising out of Pukhuria Police Station Case No. 150/2018 dated 06/05/2018 under Sections 364/302/201/120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 9(b) of the Indian Explosives Act.

¶4

And

¶5

In the matter of: - Jahiruddin @ Babua …petitioner.

¶6

Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Ld. Sr. Adv., Md. Safiur Rahaman, Mr. Rahul Ganguly, Mr. Sourav Paul

¶7

…for the petitioner.

¶8

Mr. Masud Mallik

¶9

…for the de facto complainant.

¶10

Mr. Sudip Ghosh, Ld. Sr. Govt. Adv., Mr. Bitasok Banerjee

¶11

…for the State.

¶12

An issue has arisen as to whether or not the petitioner was less than 18 years old as on the date of occurrence of the alleged offence. A report was called for from the Investigating Officer. Such report has been filed and is kept with the record. However, Mr. Mukherjee, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner, says that reliance cannot be placed on that report.

¶13

We are of the view that it would be appropriate if the Juvenile Justice Board or the Committee referred to Rule 19 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 goes into this issue and decides as to whether or not the petitioner was less than or more than 18 years old as on the

¶14

¶15

date of occurrence, i.e., May 5, 2018. Let such decision be taken within eight weeks from the date of communication of this order to the Board or the Committee.

¶16

We dispose of this application by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum once the issue as regards the age of the petitioner is settled by the Board or the Committee, as the case may be.

¶17

The State shall communicate to the petitioner or to his learned Advocate, the decision of the Board or the Committee as regards the age of the petitioner within three days from the date of receipt of the decision from the Board/Committee.

¶18

Accordingly, the application for bail being C.R.M. 1869 of 2021 is disposed of.

¶19

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶20

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)

Jahiruddin @Babua v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jahiruddin @Babua v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajahan Sk and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Altab Mia@Altaf Mia Anr. Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Mojahar Sk@Md Mojahar Ali Vs State of West Bengal

Saddam Sk @ Pichhi Vs State of West Bengal

Biswajit Gorai Vs State of West Bengal

Chhotu Saha Vs State of West Bengal