The petitioners withdrew their application for anticipatory bail as they had already been taken into custody. Consequently, the court dismissed the application due to non-prosecution without further adjudication on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33. 27.08.2021 Ct.32 Tanmoy C.R.M. 2130 of 2021 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. And In the matter of: - Kashinath Biswas & Ors. ….petitioners. Mr. Prabir Majumder …for the petitioners. Mr. N.P. Agarwala …for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioners says that he has instructions not to press this application for anticipatory bail since the petitioners have already been taken into custody. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 2130 of 2021 is dismissed for non prosecution . All parties shall act in terms of server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kashinath Biswas & Ors.
State
Bivas Pattanayak
Arijit Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
