Allowed

Kalu Mandal@Sujit v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC27 Aug 2021CRM/1751/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a murder case after reviewing the Case Diary and noting that other accused were already on bail. Bail was granted with conditions of furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one local.

Kalu Mandal@Sujit Vs State of West Bengal — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

28. 27.08.2021 Ct.32 Tanmoy Allowed

¶2

C.R.M. 1751 of 2021 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 11/02/2021 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 383/2020 dated 16/05/2020 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of: - Kalu Mandal @ Sujit ….petitioner. Mr. Amitabha Karmakar, Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick …for the petitioner. Mr. P.K. Datta, Ld. A.P.P., Mr. Santanu Deb Roy …for the State.

¶3

The allegation is that the petitioner and few other persons found the victim stealing a mobile phone, caught him and beat him to death. A case has been registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

The petitioner says that he was one of the persons; the other persons have all been granted anticipatory bail after being apprehended. Charge-sheet has been filed.

¶5

Learned Counsel for the State produces the Case Diary and draws our attention to a statement of an eyewitness recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The said person named all the accused people including the petitioner.

¶6

We have considered the material in the Case Diary and the overall facts and circumstances of the case. The other accused persons have been granted bail by the learned trial

¶7

¶8

Court. Since charge-sheet has been filed already, we are of the view that immediate custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary so long as he is willing to co-operate with further investigation, if any.

¶9

Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and shall abide by the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶10

In case the petitioner fails to adhere to any of the conditions mentioned in Section 438(2) of the Code, the learned Court below shall be entitled to cancel the anticipatory bail without further reference to this Court.

¶11

The application being C.R.M. 1751 of 2021 is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶12

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶13

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)

Kalu Mandal@Sujit v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalu Mandal@Sujit v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajikul Momin @ Md. Rajikul Momin Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Raja Ghoshal Vs State of West Bengal

Kashinath Mondal@Kashi Mondal Vs State of West Bengal

Rama Pramanik Vs State of West Bengal

Kashinath Biswas and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Ab Halim @ Abdul Halim @ Laltu Sk and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal