The Court dismissed an application for relaxation of bail conditions under CrPC since the petitioners failed to appear at the hearing despite multiple calls.
Dismissal of the bail relaxation application due to default in appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRAN 1 of 2021 In CRM 207 of 2021
17.05.2022 In Sl. 93 Court No.29 CRM 207 of 2021 Suvayan In Re: - An application for relaxation of condition of bail under Section 439(1) (b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. And
In the matter of: Saiful Haque @ Sutfal Sk. & Ors. ….petitioners. None appears for the parties even in the second call. Thus, CRAN 1 of 2021 is dismissed for default.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application filed by the petitioners shall be allowed given their default in appearance.
Whether the impugned order dismissing the application for relaxation of bail condition is sustainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saiful Haque @ Sutfal Sk. & Ors.
Debangsu Basak
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
