Allowed

Dipak Banik v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC17 Dec 2021CRM/1145/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Calcutta High Court, Jalpaiguri Bench granted anticipatory bail to Dipak Banik accused of offences under Sections 376/417/420/406/506/34 IPC. The court found no prima facie case of rape against him and deemed custodial interrogation unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, meeting the Investigating Officer once a week, and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Dipak Banik Vs the State of West Bengal — Cheating and Forgery | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

CIRCUIT BENCH OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT 17.12.2021 AT JALPAIGURI

¶2

17.12.2021

¶3

Court No.01 Item No. 23

¶4

¶5

CRM 1145 of 2021

¶6

(Via Video Conference)

¶7

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Siliguri Women Police Station Case No. 145 of 2021 dated 03.10.2021 under Sections 376/417/420/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

And

¶9

In Re: Dipak Banik Petitioner Mr. Biplab Sengupta For the Petitioner Mr. Abhijit Sarkar Mr. Aniruddha Biswas For the State

¶10

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a senior citizen and has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

¶11

The learned Counsel for the State has produced the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶12

We have perused the case diary and considered the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and it is found that the materials, prima facie, do not disclose any offence under Section 376 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as against the present petitioner. The views are prima facie and not conclusive.

¶13

Having considered the nature and extent of involvement of the petitioner in the commission of the alleged offence, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary and the petitioner may be granted anticipatory bail.

¶14

¶15

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner, namely, Dipak Banik, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the IO once in a week until further orders. .

¶16

The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and CRM 1145 of 2021 is accordingly, disposed of.

¶17

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶18

(Biswajit Basu, J)

Dipak Banik v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipak Banik v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bimal Barman Vs the State of West Bengal

Asrafi Khanam and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal

Biplab Kumar Nandi and Anr. Vs Jalpaiguri Municipality and Ors.

Premjit Roy and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal

Raju Mandal Vs the State of West Bengal

Madhu Sarkar and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal