Allowed

Bimal Barman v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC16 Dec 2021CRM/739/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Calcutta High Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. The court directed that the petitioner be released on bail if arrested, subject to a bond and specific conditions, finding custodial interrogation unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner directed to be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon arrest.

Bimal Barman Vs the State of West Bengal — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

CIRCUIT BENCH OF CALCUTTA HIGH COURT 16.12.2021 AT JALPAIGURI

¶2

16.12.2021

¶3

Court No.01 Item No. 62 Allowed sg

¶4

CRM 739 of 2021

¶5

(Via Video Conference)

¶6

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Sitai Police Station Case No. 100 of 2013 dated 22.07.2013 under Sections 147/148/149/324/325/326/302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

And

¶8

In Re : Bimal Barman

¶9

Petitioners

¶10

Mr. Sudip Guha For the Petitioners Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, APP Mr. A.K. Sarkar Mr. T. Bhattacharjee Mr. Biswarup Roy

¶11

The report filed by the ASI, Sitai Police Station, Cooch Behar is taken on record.

¶12

The report prima facie shows that the accused namely, Bimal Roy and Bimal Barman are one and the same person. However, the said report is not conclusive but only on prima facie.

¶13

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the nature and complicity of the petitioner in the commission of alleged offence as well as with regard to the fact that most of the co-accused persons, similarly placed as that of the present petitioner, were granted bail and few other were granted anticipatory bail and also having regard to the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed, we are of the view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary.

¶14

¶15

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner, namely, Bimal Barman, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the petitioner shall meet the Officer-in-Charge of the Sitai Police Station once in a month or until further order.

¶16

The petitioner shall attend the learned Court below on each and every date of hearing. In default, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail without any further reference to this Court.

¶17

The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and CRM 739 of 2021 is accordingly, disposed of.

¶18

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

¶19

(Biswajit Basu, J) (Soumen Sen, J)

Bimal Barman v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bimal Barman v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdar Ali Miah Vs Md. Akbar Ali And Anr.

Sri Dilip Kumar Agarwal Vs Smt. Sabitri Devi Agarwal and Ors.

Shyam Sundar Paul Vs Goutam Poddar and Ors.

Asrafi Khanam and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal

Biplab Kumar Nandi and Anr. Vs Jalpaiguri Municipality and Ors.

Nitai Barman @ Rahul Vs the State of West Bengal