A contempt application brought up for adjudication on 'Last Chance' list as no parties appeared despite proper notice. The court observed non-appearance implies lack of interest and disposed of the matter without any further order, discharging the rule.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD 12
ORDER SHEET
CC/3/2001
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) ORIGINAL SIDE
ASIF IQBAL VERSUS ARUN KUMAR ROY
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE Date: 2nd July, 2021.
(Via Video Conference)
The Court: This contempt application arises out of alleged violation of an order dated 5th January, 2000 passed in W.P. 18 of 2000. The matter appeared in the list on 1st July, 2021, when no one appeared on behalf of any of the parties even at the second call. The matter is appearing in the day’s list marked as ‘Last Chance’ with a note that appropriate orders will be passed if no one appears when the matter is taken up.
No one has applied for joining in the virtual mode. None of the parties are represented when the matter is called on. It appears that the parties are not interested in proceeding with the matter.
The contempt petition is disposed of without any further order.
Rule, if any, stands discharged.
(ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.)
B.Pal/ Sp
ASIF IQBAL
ARUN KUMAR ROY
ARINDAM MUKHERJEE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
