The Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) Division dismissed the contempt application in default of appearance by parties. As no one appeared to represent the matter, the court treated the parties as uninterested and disposed of the petition without any order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-20
ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Contempt) ORIGINAL SIDE [Via Video Conference]
CC/145/2001
ASHUTOSH MONDAL Versus DEBENDRA MOHON KANWAR & ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE Date : 1st July, 2021.
The Court : This contempt application arises out of alleged violation of an order dated 14th March, 2001 passed in W. P. No. 653 of 1995. The matter appeared in the list on 30th June, 2021, when no one appeared on behalf of any of the parties even at the second call. The matter is appearing in the day’s list marked as ‘Last Chance’ with a note that appropriate orders will be passed if no one appears when the matter is taken up.
No one has applied for joining in the virtual mode. None of the parties are represented when the matter is called on. It appears that the parties are not interested in proceeding with the matter.
The contempt petition is disposed of without any further order.
Rule, if any, stands discharged.
(ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.)
S.Bag
Ashutosh Mondal
Debendra Mohon Kanwar
Others
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
