The single-judge writ bench dismissed WPA 8240 of 2020 as not maintainable since the petitioners were joint owners of land and filed a joint petition. Leave was granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh ones.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
09.12.2020 Ct. 38 D/L 1 ab
WPA 8240 of 2020
Saroj Kumar Mahapatra @ Saroj Mahapatra & Ors. -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Sk. Rejaul Alam, Mr. Rajkumar Sain, ... for the petitioners Mr. Santanu Kr. Mitra, Mr. Sudip Sarkar, … for the State
It appears that the petitioners are the owners of different plots of land. The present writ petition filed by all the petitioners jointly is not maintainable.
Accordingly, as prayed for by Mr. Alam, learned advocate for the petitioners, leave is granted to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petitions on the self-same cause of action.
The writ petition being WPA 8240 of 2020 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
( Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, J .)
Saroj Kumar Mahapatra
The State of West Bengal
Ashis Kumar Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
