Handled via video conference, the High Court of Calcutta granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw an application for non-disclosure of the correct arbitration agreement, with liberty to file afresh.
Leave to withdraw application with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-30
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
(Via Video Conference)
AP/338/2020
C.S. CONSTRUCTION GANGES (JV) Versus CHIEF ENGINEER/CONSTRUCTION III OF EASTERN RAILWAY
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY Date : 8th December, 2020
Appearance: Mr. S. Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Mandeep Kaur, Adv. ...for the petitioner
Mr. Shankar Ranjan Sen, Adv. ...for the respondent
The Court: Since the petitioner has not disclosed the
correct arbitration agreement between the parties, leave is granted to the petitioner to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh.
(ASHIS KUMAR CHAKRABORTY, J.)
TO
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw an application shall be granted when the petitioner has not disclosed the correct arbitration agreement between the parties
C.S. Construction Ganges (JV)
Chief Engineer/Construction III of Eastern Railway
Ashis Kumar Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
