Disposed
Dharmendra Berry & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
Calcutta HCCRR/3725/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Ct. No. 19 CRR 3725 of 2018 (via Video…
What the court decided
AI extract
Ct. No. 19 CRR 3725 of 2018 (via Video…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02 04.12.2020 CRR 3725 of 2018 NB (via Video Conference) Ct. No. 19 In the matter of:- Dharmendra Berry & Anr. …petitioners
Mr. Rajeep Majumder, Ms. Arushi Rathore. ….for the petitioners. Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Mr. Shantanu Chatterjee. ….for the State. Mr. Sourav Chatterjee Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya. …for the OP.
Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that a report in final form has been filed by the investigating agency in this case seeking discharge of the accused. In view of the same, the petitioners would not like to press this application.
On the prayer of the petitioners, the revisional application is disposed of as not pressed.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Dharmendra Berry & Anr.
The State
The OP
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court