Dismissed
Sanjay Patodia v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
Calcutta HCCRR/1591/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Item 12 ssi 04.12. 2020 C.R.R. 1591 of 2020…
What the court decided
AI extract
Item 12 ssi 04.12. 2020 C.R.R. 1591 of 2020…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 19 Item 12 ssi 04.12. 2020
C.R.R. 1591 of 2020
(via video conference)
In the matter of :- Sanjay Patodia
Mr. Kalyan Kr. Chakraborty Mr. Kashinath Bhattyacharya Mr. Ashok Halder Ms. A Mehebub ….for the petitioner
Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, Ld. PP Mr. Arijit Ganguly …for the State
A certified copy filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
Let a copy of the application be served upon Mr. Arijit Ganguly, learned advocate, who is present in court today and who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State. His engagement may be regularised in due course by the competent authority of the State.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner would not like to press this application and would instead file a naraji application/ protest petition before the learned trial Court.
On his prayer, the revisional application is disposed of as not pressed.
2
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Sanjay Patodia
The State
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court