The High Court disposed of a revisional application against discharge proceedings as not pressed by the petitioners after the investigating agency filed a final report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01 04.12.2020 CRR 3724 of 2018 NB (via Video Conference) Ct. No. 19
In the matter of:- Berry Cotts Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …petitioners
Mr. Rajeep Majumder, Ms. Arushi Rathore. ….for the petitioners. Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Mr. Shantanu Chatterjee. ….for the State. Mr. Sourav Chatterjee Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya. …for the OP.
Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that a report in final form has been filed by the investigating agency in this case seeking discharge of the accused. In view of the same, the petitioners would not like to press this application.
On the prayer of the petitioners, the revisional application is disposed of as not pressed.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Berry Cotts Pvt. Ltd.
Other Ors.
State
OP
Jay Sengupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
