An application for anticipatory bail was submited in connection with a matrimonial case. The court dropped the application and dispensed with the presence of the investigating officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.12.2020 Court No.28 SL No.1 b. das
CRM 7299 of 2020 (Through Video Conference)
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Basirhat P.S. Case No. 85 dated 21.10.2020 under Sections 498A/304B/306/406/ 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. And
In the matter of: Sankarlal Ghosh & Anr.
….Petitioners.
Mr. Saryati Datta
…for the Petitioners.
Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, Ld. P.P., Mr. Aniket Mitra
…for the State.
The report submitted by the investigating officer is kept with the record.
Petitioners have appeared before the court below and prayed for regular bail.
Application is dropped.
Presence of the Investigating Officer is noted and dispensed with.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
(Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for regular bail should be allowed under Sections 498A/304B/306/406/120B/34 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sankarlal Ghosh & Anr.
The State
Suvra Ghosh
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
