In an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC connected with a Tamluk Police Station case, the petitioners expressed no desire to press the application. The court dismissed the application on this ground without adjudicating on the merits.
Application dismissed as not pressed by the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.12.2020 43 sdas
C.R.M. 10088 of 2020 (via video conferencing)
In Re.: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 482 of 2020 dated 16.09.2020 under Sections 341/323/325/307/427/354B/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
And In Re : Milan Maiti & Ors. ….. petitioners
Mr. Amitabha Karmakar … for the petitioners Mr. Tanmoy Kumar Ghosh Ms. Sima Biswas …. for the State
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits
that petitioners do not wish to press this application.
Accordingly, this application for anticipatory bail is
dismissed as not pressed.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be adjudicated upon when the petitioners do not wish to press it.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Milan Maiti & Ors.
The State
Suvra Ghosh
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
