Abdul Ansari@Abdullah Ansari v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
Small Judge Bench rejected an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. Finding serious allegations against the petitioner who was falsely implicated, the court declined to extend bail and disposed of the prayers.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Applications CRM 5549 of 2020 and CRAN 1 of 2020 are disposed of.
What the court decided
10.09.2020 Item no. 17 Ct.11 BP/CHC Rejected
C.R.M. No.5549 of 2020
[C.R.A.N.1 of 2020 (Old No.C.R.A.N.3901 of 2020)] (Via Video Conference)
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
And
In the matter of:-
Abdul Ansari @ Abdullah Asari
… Petitioner
Ms. Busra Khatun
.. for the petitioner
Mr. S. S. Imam, Mr. Subrata Roy
..for the State
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent of the charges and he has been falsely implicated in the case of his brother who is a principal accused. Learned advocate for the petitioner further submits that the principal accused namely, Jahangir has already been arrested.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the privilege of anticipatory bail should be extended to the petitioner despite serious allegations against him.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Abdul Ansari @ Abdullah Asari
- respondent
State
Coram
Samapti Chatterjee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM/5549/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court