In this single-paragraph order, the Court disposed of a filed application for anticipatory bail. The advocate for the petitioner submitted that the client did not wish to proceed with the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application as 'Not Pressed'.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed on the ground that it was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.09.2020 18 AM
C.R.M. 4932 of 2020 (via video conferencing) with
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Palashipara Police Station Case No.87 of 2020 dated 25.04.2020 under Sections 376(2)(1)/306/34 of the Indian Penal Code;
Mr. Asraf Mandal, Adv. ….for the petitioner Mr. Imran Ali, Adv., Ms. Manasi Roy, Adv.
Petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the
petition/application as per Rules within one month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
The application being CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No. CRAN 3141 of 2020) is disposed of.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that his client does not want to proceed with the instant application.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as “Not Pressed”.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC should be disposed of when the applicant withdraws the application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Suvra Ghosh
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
