Contempt petition where parties failed to appear despite multiple calls and 'Last Chance' notice was disposed of ex parte with the rule discharged.
Contempt petition disposed of without any further order; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA 29.06.2021 sb Special Civil Jurisdiction Ct23 APPELLATE SIDE (Via Video Conference) CRC 2703 of 2002 In CO 2076-77 of 1993 Fajer Ali Mollah & Anr. Vs. Babur Ali Tangra
The contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 24th May, 2001 passed in CO 2076-77 of 1993. It appears that a Rule was issued against the alleged contemnor on 2nd September, 2002.
The matter appeared in the list on 28th June, 2021 and was called on twice, but no one appeared on behalf of the parties. The matter is appearing in the list today marked as “Last Chance” with a note in the list that appropriate orders will be passed if no one appears in the matter. Even today no one appears in the contempt petition. No one has applied for joining through the virtual mode.
It appears that the parties are not interested to proceed further with the contempt petition. The same is disposed of without any further order.
Rule stands discharged accordingly.
(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)
2
3
Fajer Ali Mollah & Anr.
Babur Ali Tangra
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
