Court disposed of a non-appearance contempt petition regarding a 2004 order without passing specific orders or joining parties virtually.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
48 29.06.2021 sb Ct23
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Civil Jurisdiction APPELLATE SIDE (Via Video Conference)
CRC 3885 of 2004 In CO 1804 of 2002 Sutapa Banerjee (Dutta) Vs. Gautam Banerjee
The contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 23rd August, 2004 passed in C.O. 1804 of 2002. It appears that a Rule was issued against the alleged contemnor on 8th December, 2004.
The matter appeared in the list on 28th June, 2021 and was called on twice, but no one appeared on behalf of the parties. The matter is appearing in the list today marked as “Last Chance” with a note in the list that appropriate orders will be passed if no one appears in the matter. Even today no one appears in the contempt petition. No one has applied for joining in the virtual mode.
It appears that the parties are not interested to proceed further with the contempt petition. The same is disposed of without any further order.
Rule, if any, stands discharged accordingly.
(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)
2
3
Sutapa Banerjee (Dutta)
Gautam Banerjee
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
