Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. Thr Its Officer Nikhil Narayan Deshmukh v. Vikram Vijaykumar Choubey and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; WRIT PETITION NO. 838 OF 2026; Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd v. Vikram Vijaykumar Choubey and Others; decided 04-02-2026; per Abasaheb D. Shinde, J. (with Sandipkumar C. More, J.). Petition disposed of as infructuous after petitioner counsel, on instructions, stated respondents had not adhered to clauses C and D of the impugned order within the contemplated time; respondent counsel disputed the statement. Keywords: infructuous disposal; asset reconstruction company; impugned order clauses C and D; writ petition; Aurangabad bench.
What did the court decide?
Although learned Counsel for the Respondents disputed the statement made by learned Counsel for the petitioner (that respondents had not adhered to clauses C and D of the impugned order and the contemplated time had expired, leaving nothing surviving in the petition), this Court, in the light of that statement, disposed of the petition as infructuous.