Disposed¶24

Nurain Sushikshit Berozgaracnchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain v. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr.

Bombay HC17 Feb 2026WP/6675/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

2026:BHC-NAG:3033-DB | Bombay HC Nagpur Bench | WP 6675/2024 with CA 2923/2024 | Challenge to university work order dated 26-11-2024 disposed of as infructuous (work order executed, period over); liberty to claim damages before Civil Court; contentions kept open | Kilor & Wakode, JJ. | 20 Feb 2026.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court for claiming damages from respondent No.1; contentions kept open; pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. ¶24

Nurain Sushikshit Berozgaracnchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain vs Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:BHC-NAG:3033-DB

¶2

104-WP-6675-2024.odt 1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 6675 OF 2024 WITH

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2923 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6675 OF 2024

¶6

Nurain Shshikshit Berozgaranchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidypeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr.

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.

¶10

Mr. Parvez Mirza, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs Gauri Venkatraman, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

¶11

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATE : 20th FEBRUARY, 2026.

¶12

Heard Mr. Parvez Mirza, learned counsel for the

¶13

petitioner and Mrs. Gauri Venkatramanm, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

¶14

Mrs. Gauri Venkatramanm has invited our attention to

¶15

the work order dated 26^th November 2024 which is at record page No.184- Annexure- R1-13.

¶16

Mrs. Gauri Venkatramanm, learned counsel for respondent No.1 has made a statement before this Court that the work order which was issued in favour of respondent No.2

¶17

104-WP-6675-2024.odt 2/2

¶18

has been executed and the period mentioned in the work order is over.

¶19

Mr. Parvez Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioner, however, tried to insist for grant of damages in view of alleged illegalities committed by respondent No.1 while issuing work order to the respondent No.2.

¶20

In view of the aforesaid submissions, we dispose of the present petition as infructuous as the challenge in the present writ petition was to the work order issued by the respondent No.1 to respondent No.2, whose period is now over. However,

¶21

the petitioner is at liberty to approach Civil Court for claiming damages from respondent No.1.

¶22

Needless to mention that the contentions raised in the

¶23

present writ petition are kept open.

¶24

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶25

In view of the disposal of the petition, pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶26

( RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.)

¶27

MJ Jadhav

Nurain Sushikshit Berozgaracnchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain v. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nurain Sushikshit Berozgaracnchi Saha. Sanstha Amravati, Thr. Secretary, Mukaddis Husain v. Sant Gadge Baba Amravati Vidyapeeth, Thr. Registrar, Amravati and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anil S/O Gajananrao Dhoble vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary Irrigation Dept., Mumbai and Others

Mr. Anilkumar S/O Nirmalkumar Patni vs Smt. Vanmathi Chenniappan, Collector, Wardha

M/S a. H. Wheeler and Company Ltd., Thr. Authorized Signatory, Mandeep Kumar Srivastava vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi and Ors.

Pralhad S/O. Shamraoji Dhote vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Savita W/O Dilip Dhandare vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary of Rural Devpt. Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Chandrakala Ashok Hinge and Another vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Home Department, Mumbai and Another