Disposed¶21

Tapan Kiran Doshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC3 Feb 2026WP/5896/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR C.R. No.683/2025 (S. 69 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita), MHB Colony Police Station, Mumbai; liberty reserved to apply for discharge before Trial Court; disposed of as withdrawn; Bhobe, J.; 06 May 2026.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file an application seeking discharge before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage. ¶21

Tapan Kiran Doshi vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN GOPAL Date: CHANDAN 2026.05.09 12:08:55 +0530

¶2

(2) WP-5896.25.DOCX

¶3

lgc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5896 OF 2025

¶6

Tapan Kiran Doshi : Petitioner. Versus Tthe State of Maharashtra and anr. : Respondents.

¶7

Mr. Shantanu Kadam for the Petitioner. Mrs. P. P. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Tarun Shrivastava i/by Mr. Haresh Bodke for Respondent No.2.

¶8

PSI Usha Khose, MHB Colony Police Station, Mumbai present. IO API Dipti Shinde present.

¶9

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

¶10

DATED : 06 MAY 2026

¶11

PC:-

¶12

This Petition is circulated in view of the praecipe dated 04 May 2026, same is marked as “ X ” for identification.

¶13

The Petitioner has sought for the following substantive reliefs in this Petition:-

¶14

“(a) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to quash and set-aside the impugned FIR bearing C.R. No.683/2025 registered with MHB Colony Police Station for offence punishable under section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on 04.10.2025 at the instance of Respondent No.2 in the interest of justice.”

¶15

¶16

(2) WP-5896.25.DOCX

¶17

Mr. Shantanu Kadam, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this Writ Petition, with liberty to file an application seeking discharge before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage.

¶18

The request made by Mr. Shantanu Kadam, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, is not opposed by Mrs. P P Bhosale, learned APP for the Respondent/State.

¶19

In view of the statement made by Mr. Shantanu Kadam, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty as prayed for.

¶20

If the application seeking discharge is filed before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage, the same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶21

Criminal Writ Petition No. 5896 of 2025 is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶22

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶23

Tapan Kiran Doshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tapan Kiran Doshi v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anton Nazarov Thr His Natural Guardian and Next Friend Petitioner NO.2 and 2 Ors. vs the Union of India Thr the Secretary and 7 Ors.

Dr Kumkum Mukesh Mishra vs the State of Maharashtra

Gia India Laboratory Pvt. Ltd. through Mr Fredy Hansotia vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rakshant Kirtikumar Rawal vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rajendra Krushna Sankpal vs State of Maharashtra

Rahmani Aadil Mohammad Saeed vs State of Maharashtra